Arcane Brilliance: The end of an era

Welcome, mages, to this most unusual and unexpected issue of Arcane Brilliance. I'm sure many of you have noticed that your beloved Mr. Pants is not here today, and you're wondering what "that warlock guy" is doing writing AB. Well, it seems that Blizz has decided to put an end to the rivalry between mages and warlocks with an audacious change to the make-up of casters within WoW.
No doubt some have already read the blue posts that have made it into the recent Cataclysm class change threads so this post will come as no shock to you -- but for those that have not, my aim today is to not only repeat their words but also try to analyse their impact, as we see it here at WoW.com. So take the jump after the break and we'll learn more about the merging of the mage and warlock classes.
The post that started this flow of information (that quickly became a flood) was this one on the warlock changes thread:

On the continued acquisition of 'mage-like' spells by warlocks, we are aware that this meets with disapproval by some warlocks. However we have a very specific goal in mind for the future of the class and see this as a necessary part of it. I think when you see the whole thing you'll agree it's really pretty cool.
Obviously this threw up many posts of speculation, questions and not a little concern. Not only from warlocks but also many mage players who shared many of the concerns of the warlocks, though from a different viewpoint. I can only assume that the sheer weight of opinions led to the following announcement being issued:

As we continue to develop this game we find many new and exciting avenues to explore, not only new areas, such as Outlands and Northrend but new classes such as Death Knights and others we have on the drawing-board. Unfortunately it becomes increasingly difficult to introduce more complexity to an already highly complex game, especially as we endeavour to ensure that our game is balanced and accessible to new players.
As well as developing new and interesting game elements we have also learned what has not worked so well within our original design. In particular we have concerns about the class balance for casters.
There has been an ongoing rivalry between the mage and warlock communities and we see a lot of this is due to the glaring similarities between the two classes. There is also a high level of confusion for new players as to which of these pure spell-caster classes they should select. As more game-play balancing changes have been made this division has further blurred. Not only have warlocks gained many mage-like spells but there is increasing call within the mage community for permanent pets.
In delivering the mage-like spells to warlocks we have noticed that before long in Cataclysm there will be no clear role for mages. As such we will be merging the classes into one.
Exact details of how this will happen will be provided soon.
As well as developing new and interesting game elements we have also learned what has not worked so well within our original design. In particular we have concerns about the class balance for casters.
There has been an ongoing rivalry between the mage and warlock communities and we see a lot of this is due to the glaring similarities between the two classes. There is also a high level of confusion for new players as to which of these pure spell-caster classes they should select. As more game-play balancing changes have been made this division has further blurred. Not only have warlocks gained many mage-like spells but there is increasing call within the mage community for permanent pets.
In delivering the mage-like spells to warlocks we have noticed that before long in Cataclysm there will be no clear role for mages. As such we will be merging the classes into one.
Exact details of how this will happen will be provided soon.
This was pretty amazing news indeed, but I for one agree that the homogenization of the classes has led to some confusion. I am also pretty excited by how this change could open the door for further classes to be introduced.
The WoW.com leads have let me know that an un-named source within the Blizzard dev team has confirmed that last weeks Arcane Brilliance did in fact help push forward this decision. The title image was so evocative of mage-voidwalker concept art that they felt the community was finally ready to accept the changes.
Anyway, we can't really draw many conclusions from this first announcement but thankfully they already had the info we were looking for and it didn't take long to be posted. So now lets look at the details.

We want to get as much information as we have available to you as quickly as we can so here's the first of a series of posts that will start to explain the details of how we see this change coming about.
From the release of patch 4.0 the mage class will cease to be within the game. Existing mage players will be converted to warlocks and have access to all the spells, talents and abilities of that class.
In order to accommodate all races that can currently support the mage class, warlocks will subsequently be able to select from the Troll and Draenei races.
Mage utility spells such as portals and conjured food will be available to be learned from the warlock trainers.
Many of the talents from the arcane and frost trees will be transferred to the imp minion. Imps will have a similar talent selection tool to hunter pets.
Some of the mage trainers have embraced the change and will be serving as warlock trainers going forward, while others have given up altogether and will no longer talk to players.
We will endeavor to ensure all the remaining 'cool' mage spells are passed to warlocks so those players being transferred will feel more at home.
Mages will continue to play a role as NPCs in the game but this merging will allow us room to introduce further new player character classes in the future.
From the release of patch 4.0 the mage class will cease to be within the game. Existing mage players will be converted to warlocks and have access to all the spells, talents and abilities of that class.
In order to accommodate all races that can currently support the mage class, warlocks will subsequently be able to select from the Troll and Draenei races.
Mage utility spells such as portals and conjured food will be available to be learned from the warlock trainers.
Many of the talents from the arcane and frost trees will be transferred to the imp minion. Imps will have a similar talent selection tool to hunter pets.
Some of the mage trainers have embraced the change and will be serving as warlock trainers going forward, while others have given up altogether and will no longer talk to players.
We will endeavor to ensure all the remaining 'cool' mage spells are passed to warlocks so those players being transferred will feel more at home.
Mages will continue to play a role as NPCs in the game but this merging will allow us room to introduce further new player character classes in the future.
So as we can see the mage class will no longer exist within Cataclysm and so there will be little obvious need for the Arcane Brilliance column. While this is something we are still discussing here at WoW.com, it is possible that it will live on to cover the exciting changes being made to imps. I have heard that while Christian Belt was a little too emotional at the news to give any clear (or at least coherent) indication, he is interested in continuing with us fulfilling the roll of Imp columnist.

While I'm sure there will be those who feel this is the worst thing to happen to the game we must all learn to embrace changes like this. In the same way that the changes to the old-world will be removing tired and under-used areas of the game -- generating many a nostalgic trip to Desolace and the like -- this change should be seen as invigorating. WoW players are an adaptive bunch on the whole and before long I'm sure we'll look back on the 'quaint' two-caster system in the same way we do at the time before mage-tables and summoning-wardrobes.
A note from the Managing Editor of WoW.com: For those of you not in on the Hobbs/Belt rivalry, this post is a playful jab from our resident Warlock columnist at the regular Mage columnist. Zarhym did not actually say anything quoted above. Mr. Belt will be hijacking this week's Warlock column to respond and will return to writing Arcane Brillance next week.

Filed under: Mage, Humor, (Mage) Arcane Brilliance
Reader Comments (Page 3 of 18)
pcj Apr 11th 2010 3:09PM
Some kind of weird, lame, late April Fool's, I guess...sour grapes maybe?
Rexton Apr 11th 2010 3:11PM
April Fools is best when done 10 days after April Fools Day.
Edge Apr 11th 2010 4:58PM
My god, so in this new era of April Fools I will have not one but TWO days I have to worry about being fooled!!??? And it's not necessarily on the same day every year!!?? Old Gods new Gods, any Gods help us!
Bronwyn Apr 11th 2010 7:28PM
You not only have to worry about 2 days, you have to worry about every day because no one will be able to agree what the "second" april fools is.
Jack Miles Apr 11th 2010 3:11PM
Great, now our Warlock holes are gonna be full of bloody mages.
Jack Miles Apr 11th 2010 3:14PM
W/e, i'll give you guys the tour. Here is where the Succubi are. There might be more around here but we've honestly never looked.
Valt Apr 11th 2010 3:29PM
Blood mages would be kinda cool tho...
Burnout changes sound like that too. oom = health turns to mana
Rexton Apr 11th 2010 3:31PM
A Blood Mage sounds like a Red Lantern to me.
"Blood Mage, DPS for crying out loud!"
"YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO BALARGHDLKAF"
tricia cedars Apr 11th 2010 3:12PM
This better be a joke and it's a bad one for the record.
Dude Apr 11th 2010 3:12PM
Why make shit up on a news reporting site? Do you want people to actually NOT visit your site anymore? This is not the 1st of April. Making shit up is your #1 stop to losing visitors because you're not credible anymore...Just saying...
Kevin Apr 11th 2010 3:38PM
1) blog site. not news site.
2) you have failed so hard i'm having difficulty seeing you.
Rubella Apr 11th 2010 5:08PM
Hell no!
Jokes can only be posted on specifically identified days, with advance notice to the community, and only so far as they are not made about mages.
Hellhammer Apr 11th 2010 3:13PM
Uh huh. Something tells me we're being had. If mages wanted to play warlocks they'd have rolled them in the first place. No way Blizzard runs off hundreds of thousands of subscribers with something this dimwitted.
Zhiva Apr 11th 2010 3:12PM
...
Flagship Apr 11th 2010 3:12PM
Isn't it a bit late for April Fools?
Hansbo Apr 11th 2010 3:12PM
This seems to be 11 days late.
Hansbo Apr 11th 2010 3:17PM
On the other hand, you actually had me there, for a while :)
Jennifer Apr 11th 2010 3:13PM
It is not nice of you to screw with our heads this way! I just got up, damn you!
d'Avitant Apr 11th 2010 3:14PM
I'm going to assume that this is a joke...
Nanoha Apr 11th 2010 3:14PM
I call Bulls**t on this, why would blizzard decide to do 2 seperate class previews when they intend to merge them together.
The mechanics for both classes also badly clash with each other and both sides would hate whatever amalgamation results from such a hybrid of the classes.
And it will be a cold day in hell before imps start casting frost spells.
I hope that this is a late April fools joke as the implications of such an action would dwarf whatever cataclysm deathwing has planned.