Blood Pact: Truth, science and flying monsters
Last week saw things in the world of WoW.com turn on their heads somewhat, with the Archmage Pants and myself trading columns for a week. A little back story might be in order. I was flicking through the forum for the Cataclysm mage changes ("Know your enemy" -- Sun Tzu) and found a lot of crying about spells being removed. For those who didn't read it, the feeling was that spells like Dampen Magic had "no clear role" in the game. Over 1,000 posts later, Ghostcrawler himself felt it necessary to step in and make a semi-retraction of the phrase to stem the flow of tears.
This experience played right into a hypothesis I have that mages are credulous crybabies. I stress here that this is a hypothesis, a tentative explanation for an observation, little better than a guess. However, these things beg to be tested and elevated to the status of theory. And so a test was performed to study both the credulity and propensity for lacrimation of mages. I put forward that this test was entirely successful in validating the hypothesis and that further such studies should be performed to corroborate -- maybe I should ask someone for a research grant. Either way, I feel that we are well on the way to scientifically proving that mages are indeed credulous crybabies.
This, my fellow warlocks, is how you come about facts. It has nothing to do with simply trusting the assertions of someone claiming a list of "facts" with no proper basis in reality. Especially when that someone is a mage.
Anyway, with the sciency bit behind us, I wanted to pick up on one of the hotly discussed topics from our own Cataclysm class change forum post -- that of flying mounts for warlocks. Ok, so it wasn't mentioned in the forum post, but that's kinda the point. Its absence was a glaring hole, bigger than the space where a mage's sense of humor used to be. It was picked up later in the thread with the following:
Zarhym - Cataclysm Class Preview - Warlock
Flying mounts and female Metamorphosis forms are great ideas and something we've had on the wish list for a long time. We can only create so many new creatures during a single expansion, and getting one of these might mean fewer new creatures in outdoor worlds or dungeons. It's just a trade-off and sometimes you have to make hard calls. We'll keep them on the list though.
For me, this is pretty telling. What we have here is a clear acceptance that providing locks with flying mounts is both "a great idea" and "on the developer's wish list." The only argument against is that of resources. This is pretty much the last obstacle to something being put into the game. As a company, Blizzard needs to invest time and effort in areas that will yield the greatest return. Frankly, that comes down to appreciation, so if warlocks want it enough and will appreciate it enough, then it makes the game that much better to encourage more people to play the game. "Yeah I play WoW. I play a warlock. It's sooo cool I can't wait 'til I get my demonic flying mount; it looks really badass." "Hey, that does sound cool; I'll start playing right now."
The big problem seems to be what form this badass flying mount should take. As you might have guessed from the title image, I have been playing around with some ideas and wanted to go through them with you.
Winged steeds are one way to go. In the image, I've just re-colored the model of Invincible (Arthas' mount) to get some kind of feel. This seems the natural progression for the warlock mounts, continuing on from the Felsteed and the Dreadsteed. The winged horse model is pretty new to the game but is obviously something that can be re-skinned, as demonstrated with the purchasable Celestial Steed. The similarities between the two examples in game at the moment are clear (the armor, for example). Change the color a bit (and a bit better than I did), add a few flames and spikes and you're away. Doesn't seem a load of work to be done.
The wings from Malefic Raiment are also another option that are often put forward. I group this one up with any "sprout wings from the warlock" solution and are a basic flight-form variant similar to that of the druids (who have been doing this sort of thing since The Burning Crusade). Though it is undeniably cool to think of growing demon wings out of your back, I found the Malefic coloring to be to rainbow-like for my blood. Also, it was a model that was only designed to display once; there doesn't seem to be modeling for flapping in flight. If it were to work, I believe it would need a new wing form designed from scratch. I like it but think it's asking too much.
Being carried by a doomguard is a silly idea I floated but while it might be a little daft and demeaning, I actually like it and think it wouldn't be too hard to model -- though having the mount above the character may well not be desirable from a mechanics perspective.
Metamorphosis is probably the simplest answer. It's already a form that warlocks can talent into for combat and has the flight modeling all done (though unused). It does open the debate about having a female version once again. I'm afraid I'm not behind this one. If I channel the form of a demon, then I expect to take that demon's form, and while there are female demon forms, this one isn't. Not that I would want to dissuade the development of a female meta; I just don't think that just because there are calls for it, we should let that stand in the way of further use of the metamorphosis as a flight form for warlocks.
My preference would be for growing bat-like wings but understand that would be a load of work. I'd like to know what you would like to see or think is most appropriate. So here's a poll just for that. You'll notice there's a mage trap, so we can simply discount their votes afterwards.
Winged steeds | |
---|---|
Growing wings | |
Carried by a demon | |
Metamorphosis | |
I suggested something else in the comments | |
Warlocks shouldn't have a class flying mount or form |
Blood Pact is a weekly column detailing DoTs, demons and all the dastardly deeds done by warlocks. If you're curious about what's new with locks since the last patch, check out WoW.com's guide to patch 3.3 or find out what's upcoming in Cataclysm from the BlizzCon 2009: Class Discussion Panel.
Filed under: Warlock, (Warlock) Blood Pact, Cataclysm
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 8)
Kam Apr 19th 2010 2:07PM
wings fo´sho
BelfPriest Apr 19th 2010 6:46PM
BACK OFF YOU DIRTY DEMON!! Something that hasn't been discussed is what priests think about the mage/warlock love/hate (minus the love) relationship. Dawn needs to find the inner puma and defend us! WE are the ones who should get WINGS and WE deserve a speed thing that is for us(besides a 12% increase -_-)that is class specific, and i would think it would be ok for warlocks to have the evil wings and priests have the preaty shiny angel wings, but how do you think Draqula, uh i mean our very own Fox Van Allen would feel about that? I say give priests wings and have warlocks be happy that they had a nice run with
their dreadsteed and fellstead. Forgive me if i troll:)
Felix_NZ Apr 19th 2010 11:11PM
flying demon horse for a pro.
Sorithal Apr 20th 2010 12:35AM
Nothing else needs to be said.
Random Apr 20th 2010 1:23AM
Nah, priest... 'locks should get meta form flight, pallies should be able to use those gay angel wings, and priests should have Levitate turned into a one-size-fits-all Fly spell. Of course, then mages will want to teleport to wherever on the map they click.
...
I'm okay with that. Meta form flight!!!
Jack Miles Apr 19th 2010 2:06PM
"further such studies should be performed to corroborate"
Already on it.
siebrenf Apr 20th 2010 1:23AM
I regret to inform you that some of my fellow arcane practitioners have fallen to cynicism due to the constant stress of having to conjure water in order to rinse warlocks charred remains of their robes constantly.
In the case of removing some of our spells I totally agree mages in general overreact. The removal is clearly ment to balance the new dispel system, as masterminds ourselves we should accept this unfortunale change.
As for the warlock mount, you already know wich awnser I selected by default, although I would like to see the Doomguards enslave break during flight...
Bvannas Apr 19th 2010 2:07PM
Warlocks with wings?
*Begins work on Anti-Winged-Warlock-Weapon or Awww.*
viendictive Apr 19th 2010 2:59PM
With no hate on warlocks whatsoever, I unbiasedly believe that metamorphosis-flight-form is the sure fire way to go as far as class-saavy cataclysm flight is concerned.
Just having wings is rather drab and I think any class would deserve better than that. Furthermore, I feel that paladins should get to fly on their "Avenging Wrath" wings, which are bright, golden and magical and not just plain old wings.
/roll ....Viendictive rolls 4 (1-100).
Draih Apr 19th 2010 3:28PM
Yes, pallies need golden wings!
Back to warlocks... again, wings. That is all.
NeoPhobos Apr 19th 2010 5:52PM
No need for wings. Just find the nearest mage, break out a whip, and I'm sure he'd gladly send you anywhere you'd like. Or, if that doesn't work, just jump on his back and demand that he flies you there.
ash Apr 19th 2010 7:25PM
I couldn't help but think of Aion when the idea of growing wings was mentioned. Three dimensional combat is coming to WOW, rawr!
Nasgoroth Apr 19th 2010 2:13PM
I would absolutely LOVE some kind of fiery Frostwyrm
feniks9174 Apr 19th 2010 2:29PM
The Emberwyrm flying above the Ruby Dragonshrine comes to mind . . .
Personally, I am more partial to the sprouting wings or meta options myself.
jerdthewarlock Apr 19th 2010 3:49PM
Isn't fiery Frostwyrm an oxymoron? :D
Nasgoroth Apr 20th 2010 7:46AM
We'll call it a Felwyrm :p
Smoe Apr 25th 2010 7:04PM
http://www.wowwiki.com/Fel_dragon
http://www.wowwiki.com/Nightbane_(boss)
http://www.wowwiki.com/Magmawyrm
The Legion has its hand in creating these to begin with, It's allready in existance, It will make people rock out with their lock out, and It works with the warlock identity.
Any objections? *>.>
Grizzleton Apr 19th 2010 2:10PM
I've always thought those wings should have a use in meta. What are these demons, emo emus? Fly, damn you, FLY!
Anathemys Apr 19th 2010 5:45PM
"Emo Emus".....
1.) They're emo.
2.) They don't work at what they're supposed to do.
-AND-
3.) It's not at all threatening or scary or fearsome at all.
Well, this list applies to warlocks and emo emus, so I guess it's a match!
I could make a fortune off of this, it's like eHarmony with class mounts....
Paladins:
1.) Sparkles in sunlight.
2.) Are annoying.
Calculating match: Edward!
fleabyte75 Apr 19th 2010 2:12PM
I think "being carried" AND metamorphosis are both awesome ideas. But I'll take whatever class flight they want to give with open arms.